| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY 13:05 - Aug 11 with 31774 views | TheResurrection |
This is what we're up against.
Some won't even be there but if we went a goal down they won't be able to get to their keyboards quick enough.
This is what we were up against last season. Some of our fans, especially the ones posting on here, WANT us to fail.
Beware of the enemy within.
SUPPORT YOUR FOOTBALL CLUB - YOU WONT HAVE ANOTHER ONE |  |
| |  |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 11:28 - Sep 8 with 1983 views | costalotta |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 19:21 - Sep 6 by chad |
Angry and vengeful, if that were the case I would have never supported the res when he suggested we could be worse off without Jenkins.
What I have put there is a direct quote from the Guardian so they obviously thought he did.
In fact at the end of last season we went on the longest run of losses all season.
You may wish to peddle the shareholder agreement as a myth but that document was indeed a contractual agreement ratified by common enactment. At least Jenkins understood this, that is why he desperately tried to push the Trust to sign away their rights to it on the eleventh hour before the sale.
That is also why Jason tried to me he knew nothing about it when I fronted him on pushing through the sale without the known contractual rights of the Trust being met first.
That is despite according to the Trust providing the prospective new owners with a copy of that contract. In fact after denying any knowledge of it in that recorded meeting Jason then told me they had requested a copy - not sure how that works.
The Trust solicitors are also clear on the validity of this and is one of the issues the sellouts / new owners will be taken on
Lastly why do you think being from Swansea / having a connection to the club means doing a more capable job - we have seen how the sellouts have lied and cheated
In fact the likes of Leon and Angel who would be seen as some of the most committed members of the club are not even from Wales. |
Excellent post. |  | | |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 11:31 - Sep 8 with 1969 views | E20Jack |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 11:28 - Sep 8 by costalotta |
Excellent post. |
Agreed.. if only it were true. |  |
| |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 11:39 - Sep 8 with 1959 views | costalotta |
They do seem more worried this week than previous weeks and have had the sham interview,
And the social media damage limitation campaign in full force. Perhaps in readiness for what’s coming! If they had a little bit of forward planning they could have had a more cohesive comms plan in place rather than it being random, loose and contradictory.
If it’s wasnt our club it would be hilarious.
Go get em Trust and people’s of our city and fans from wherever you are back the action! | | | |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 15:10 - Sep 8 with 1921 views | chad |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 11:31 - Sep 8 by E20Jack |
Agreed.. if only it were true. |
Oh E20 you are a caution, you missed the opportunity to correctly claim only a fraction of it is true
That however would be 1/1th
Still who would have thought someone with your professed knowledge would not have known that an unsigned / partially unsigned contract can be validated by common enactment of its stipulations by the parties to it. As in this case.
Surely the revered and all knowing (Oz - oh no sorry that’s you) Jinx would not have wasted his time trying to get the Trust to sign away their rights to the SHAG if this were not true
Never fear if you are not just teasing and really are not aware an unsigned contract can be validated by adherence to its provisions and are really open minded enough to want to know the truth then google is your friend -whilst you are there check out that accurate quote from the guardian article. |  | | |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 22:14 - Sep 8 with 1870 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
I’ve never seen any of our fans praying to lose ?
Anyone confirm this please ? |  |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:33 - Sep 8 with 1851 views | bonymine |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 04:58 - Sep 7 by E20Jack |
Says he would consider it. Of which I have no doubt he probably did.
Why has everyone decided to change that very clear statement is beyond me. |
He obviously ‘considered’ it E20 Sellout I agree until he realised what a failed Roofing Businessman would have to do in the big, wide, commercial world to ‘earn’ (don’t make me laugh) over £600k per annum as a Salary outside the SCFC Gravy Train he was on and indeed sitting comfortably .....
You Greedy B@stards Get Out Of OUR Club ..... |  |
| |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 22:39 - Sep 8 with 1826 views | E20Jack |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 15:10 - Sep 8 by chad |
Oh E20 you are a caution, you missed the opportunity to correctly claim only a fraction of it is true
That however would be 1/1th
Still who would have thought someone with your professed knowledge would not have known that an unsigned / partially unsigned contract can be validated by common enactment of its stipulations by the parties to it. As in this case.
Surely the revered and all knowing (Oz - oh no sorry that’s you) Jinx would not have wasted his time trying to get the Trust to sign away their rights to the SHAG if this were not true
Never fear if you are not just teasing and really are not aware an unsigned contract can be validated by adherence to its provisions and are really open minded enough to want to know the truth then google is your friend -whilst you are there check out that accurate quote from the guardian article. |
Great, I have just made a contract that you give me your house. It’s not signed by you or anything. I’ll bring it along, get the keys ready.
Can you provide that quote for me and tell why why that is the accurate one, and remember I said accurate not convenient.
What do you mean I am Oz and who is jinx?
Ta | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:40 - Sep 8 with 1832 views | _ |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:33 - Sep 8 by bonymine |
He obviously ‘considered’ it E20 Sellout I agree until he realised what a failed Roofing Businessman would have to do in the big, wide, commercial world to ‘earn’ (don’t make me laugh) over £600k per annum as a Salary outside the SCFC Gravy Train he was on and indeed sitting comfortably .....
You Greedy B@stards Get Out Of OUR Club ..... |
Who's Club is it more?
And honest, sensible answers here. (I may take a clipboard down Wind St to gauge this)
Bonymine - Casual Swans fan, goes down when he can be bothered and does the occasional away game
Huw Jenkins - Stepped in when all was lost with his own money. Spent so much time in the Club at the expense of his own business. Marshalled us from the very bottom of the 4th division to 7 years in the EPL. Brought us our 1 and only major honour. Took us on a dream European journey. Sold his own shares to American venture capitalists.
GET OUT OF WHO'S CLUB?? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:44 - Sep 8 with 1823 views | Darran |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:40 - Sep 8 by _ |
Who's Club is it more?
And honest, sensible answers here. (I may take a clipboard down Wind St to gauge this)
Bonymine - Casual Swans fan, goes down when he can be bothered and does the occasional away game
Huw Jenkins - Stepped in when all was lost with his own money. Spent so much time in the Club at the expense of his own business. Marshalled us from the very bottom of the 4th division to 7 years in the EPL. Brought us our 1 and only major honour. Took us on a dream European journey. Sold his own shares to American venture capitalists.
GET OUT OF WHO'S CLUB?? |
Well it’s much more Bonymines than it is E20s then eh? |  |
| |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 22:48 - Sep 8 with 1821 views | omarjack |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 22:14 - Sep 8 by oh_tommy_tommy |
I’ve never seen any of our fans praying to lose ?
Anyone confirm this please ? |
Don't tell the Res and E20 what I'm about to tell you.
But you correspondent, Alongside other posters on here who share the same set of deranged ideas, Have held a blood sacrifice ritual in Darran's attic where he dwells, An offering of an actual Swan, Which of course we used its blood to smear the words "Cardiff till I die" just so Swansea can lose, get relegated to the non-league abyss. Only so we can complain about it later on PS. And create inconvenience to Res's bubble of comfort. That's our only aim in life you know. |  |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:56 - Sep 8 with 1806 views | bonymine |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:40 - Sep 8 by _ |
Who's Club is it more?
And honest, sensible answers here. (I may take a clipboard down Wind St to gauge this)
Bonymine - Casual Swans fan, goes down when he can be bothered and does the occasional away game
Huw Jenkins - Stepped in when all was lost with his own money. Spent so much time in the Club at the expense of his own business. Marshalled us from the very bottom of the 4th division to 7 years in the EPL. Brought us our 1 and only major honour. Took us on a dream European journey. Sold his own shares to American venture capitalists.
GET OUT OF WHO'S CLUB?? |
Rather than your misguided post the actual truth here is .....
Bonymine......Swans supporter since 1974 post re-election then a Season Ticket Holder since 1976, sitting in the old ‘Double Decker’ where I had the pleasure of sitting next to Gordon Jenkins (Huw’s Dad) for many years .....Huw was nowhere to be seen as he was more interested in ‘other things’ as a chiid we were told ....so NOT a Swans fan then. ??? Hardly a ‘casual fan ‘ then am I ?
Huw Jenkins - Late entrant as a ‘Swans Fan’ ...never watched us in the 1970s ..was more involved with Britton Ferry than the Swans and sold out his shareholding in the ‘Club he loved’ (JTAK Bullshit) etc you & Martin Morgan sold us down the river & I know the other things which went on which I cannot put on here due to my divorce and that of MM & Louisa ....
But one thing I believe in......what goes around comes around .....
You Greedy B@stards Get Out Of OUR Club ... | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:58 - Sep 8 with 1803 views | bonymine |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:44 - Sep 8 by Darran |
Well it’s much more Bonymines than it is E20s then eh? |
Absolutely Darr the guy’s a fraud & laughing stock ..... | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:59 - Sep 8 with 1799 views | Darran |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:56 - Sep 8 by bonymine |
Rather than your misguided post the actual truth here is .....
Bonymine......Swans supporter since 1974 post re-election then a Season Ticket Holder since 1976, sitting in the old ‘Double Decker’ where I had the pleasure of sitting next to Gordon Jenkins (Huw’s Dad) for many years .....Huw was nowhere to be seen as he was more interested in ‘other things’ as a chiid we were told ....so NOT a Swans fan then. ??? Hardly a ‘casual fan ‘ then am I ?
Huw Jenkins - Late entrant as a ‘Swans Fan’ ...never watched us in the 1970s ..was more involved with Britton Ferry than the Swans and sold out his shareholding in the ‘Club he loved’ (JTAK Bullshit) etc you & Martin Morgan sold us down the river & I know the other things which went on which I cannot put on here due to my divorce and that of MM & Louisa ....
But one thing I believe in......what goes around comes around .....
You Greedy B@stards Get Out Of OUR Club ... |
That’s not correct about never watching us in the Seventies because he was involved with Briton Ferry but he definitely wasn’t watching us at the time of Tony Petty because he was Chairman of Briton Ferry.
Just saying. | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 23:01 - Sep 8 with 1792 views | Loyal |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:40 - Sep 8 by _ |
Who's Club is it more?
And honest, sensible answers here. (I may take a clipboard down Wind St to gauge this)
Bonymine - Casual Swans fan, goes down when he can be bothered and does the occasional away game
Huw Jenkins - Stepped in when all was lost with his own money. Spent so much time in the Club at the expense of his own business. Marshalled us from the very bottom of the 4th division to 7 years in the EPL. Brought us our 1 and only major honour. Took us on a dream European journey. Sold his own shares to American venture capitalists.
GET OUT OF WHO'S CLUB?? |
Jenkins was a Morgans mouthpiece. Very incestuous the whole thing when looked at over time. Nobody would ever argue about their love of Swansea City though. But then the only person I hear arguing... |  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 23:03 - Sep 8 with 1789 views | bonymine |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:59 - Sep 8 by Darran |
That’s not correct about never watching us in the Seventies because he was involved with Briton Ferry but he definitely wasn’t watching us at the time of Tony Petty because he was Chairman of Briton Ferry.
Just saying. |
OK Darr but it paints a picture of Jenkins which he would rather not be associated with as it doesn’t suit his ‘image’ in JTAK’ as the ‘saviour’ ....🤮🤮🤮 | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 23:09 - Sep 8 with 1780 views | Darran |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 23:03 - Sep 8 by bonymine |
OK Darr but it paints a picture of Jenkins which he would rather not be associated with as it doesn’t suit his ‘image’ in JTAK’ as the ‘saviour’ ....🤮🤮🤮 |
He got lucky by being asked to come on board. The people that put in hard work saving the club back were the likes of Mel Nurse,Dai Morgan,Steve Penny,Martin Burgess. | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 23:11 - Sep 8 with 1775 views | _ |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:59 - Sep 8 by Darran |
That’s not correct about never watching us in the Seventies because he was involved with Briton Ferry but he definitely wasn’t watching us at the time of Tony Petty because he was Chairman of Briton Ferry.
Just saying. |
Poor Bony
 | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 23:14 - Sep 8 with 1768 views | bonymine |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 23:09 - Sep 8 by Darran |
He got lucky by being asked to come on board. The people that put in hard work saving the club back were the likes of Mel Nurse,Dai Morgan,Steve Penny,Martin Burgess. |
This ....
JTAK bollux as ever ...... | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 00:02 - Sep 9 with 1699 views | E20Jack |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 22:44 - Sep 8 by Darran |
Well it’s much more Bonymines than it is E20s then eh? |
Why?
Remember any points (lies) you make have to be backed up by your own proof.
Off you go. | |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 09:06 - Sep 9 with 1609 views | Darran |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 00:02 - Sep 9 by E20Jack |
Why?
Remember any points (lies) you make have to be backed up by your own proof.
Off you go. |
You’ll have to ask The Res he’s the one making the rules up. | |
| |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 09:26 - Sep 9 with 1596 views | MattG |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 22:39 - Sep 8 by E20Jack |
Great, I have just made a contract that you give me your house. It’s not signed by you or anything. I’ll bring it along, get the keys ready.
Can you provide that quote for me and tell why why that is the accurate one, and remember I said accurate not convenient.
What do you mean I am Oz and who is jinx?
Ta |
In your example, only one party to the Contract has sought to operate its provisions. Result? No Contract.
In the case of the Shareholders Agreement, all parties operated its provisions over a period of time, not least the selling shareholders when they used it to ensure Mel Nurse's shares were sold back to the Club rather than being used to take the Trust above 25%.
Acceptance by conduct. |  | | |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 12:58 - Sep 9 with 1552 views | _ |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 09:26 - Sep 9 by MattG |
In your example, only one party to the Contract has sought to operate its provisions. Result? No Contract.
In the case of the Shareholders Agreement, all parties operated its provisions over a period of time, not least the selling shareholders when they used it to ensure Mel Nurse's shares were sold back to the Club rather than being used to take the Trust above 25%.
Acceptance by conduct. |
Must we keep bringing this up though.
Can I remind you how many times the Trust said it would NEVER sell its shares?
The Trust could've been party to the sale but they'd set their stall out early to effectively exclude themselves. This started the actions that followed and the rest is history.
And I'm not condoning what Jenkins, Morgan, Dineen did. They did do it in a very underhand way. | |
| |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 13:57 - Sep 9 with 1517 views | MattG |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 12:58 - Sep 9 by _ |
Must we keep bringing this up though.
Can I remind you how many times the Trust said it would NEVER sell its shares?
The Trust could've been party to the sale but they'd set their stall out early to effectively exclude themselves. This started the actions that followed and the rest is history.
And I'm not condoning what Jenkins, Morgan, Dineen did. They did do it in a very underhand way. |
Not sure how that's relevant to my point, to be honest, which was only about the validity of the Shareholders Agreement.
Notwithstanding that, how many times was it? | | | |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 19:09 - Sep 10 with 1402 views | Brynmill_Jack |
I'm just praying Fer and Olsson are fit and Bony is nearly ready. |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 19:23 - Sep 10 with 1387 views | _ |
| Our fans ARE PRAYING WE WILL LOSE TODAY on 13:57 - Sep 9 by MattG |
Not sure how that's relevant to my point, to be honest, which was only about the validity of the Shareholders Agreement.
Notwithstanding that, how many times was it? |
I think the point was times change, opinions change, agreements change and in relation to your exact point the Trust were not in a position to buy the others shares out as per the Mel Nurse affair.
How many times was what? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
