Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Peace talks have failed by the looks of it. 21:33 - Mar 18 with 6335 viewsReslovenSwan1

Putin has given nothing significant. Trump just has to decide to back Ukraine or not. Russians want to carry on fighting

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c3e4xzd8qq8t

[Post edited 18 Mar 21:33]

Wise sage since Toshack era
Poll: Will Cabango and Darling sign new contracts?

0
Peace talks have failed by the looks of it. on 15:59 - Apr 17 with 280 viewsReslovenSwan1

Peace talks have failed by the looks of it. on 10:16 - Apr 17 by controversial_jack

It's not breaking any law. i'm calling out genocide, others are supporting it. They are the ones breaking the law


I am not a lawyer so here is some reading for you. There is a feeling in some quarters that UK law has become to trigger happy in prosecuting people for the written word..

https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

This is presented as non legally binding. On the other hand

"The government has adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which serves as a non-legally binding working definition to help understand and recognize antisemitic behavior."

Just for information. See clause 10.
[Post edited 17 Apr 16:09]

Wise sage since Toshack era
Poll: Will Cabango and Darling sign new contracts?

0
Peace talks have failed by the looks of it. on 17:03 - Apr 17 with 210 viewscontroversial_jack

Peace talks have failed by the looks of it. on 15:59 - Apr 17 by ReslovenSwan1

I am not a lawyer so here is some reading for you. There is a feeling in some quarters that UK law has become to trigger happy in prosecuting people for the written word..

https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

This is presented as non legally binding. On the other hand

"The government has adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which serves as a non-legally binding working definition to help understand and recognize antisemitic behavior."

Just for information. See clause 10.
[Post edited 17 Apr 16:09]


That's from the Holocaust remembrance society, which would be just their definition and not legally binding as you so rightly indicated. My definition would be different.

Not once have I mentioned the Jewish people, Just their govt, regime and military. However, it seems acceptable to criticise Muslims and other ethnicities.

I agree that this country has no longer freedom of expression. Those that fought for freedom would be turning in their graves
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2025