| Conor Hourihane ? 08:48 - May 2 with 2896 views | NotLoyal |
A success or failure for you ?
Looks like he will feature in the play offs, can he make a difference ? |  |
| |  |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 08:54 - May 2 with 2884 views | Thornburyswan |
Yes he can but unfortunately just as likely to be on the negative side with his lack of movement, physicality & tracking as it is in the final third for us. |  | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 10:40 - May 2 with 2804 views | Nortbankboy |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 08:54 - May 2 by Thornburyswan |
Yes he can but unfortunately just as likely to be on the negative side with his lack of movement, physicality & tracking as it is in the final third for us. |
A match winner of used right | | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 10:47 - May 2 with 2800 views | Dr_Winston |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 10:40 - May 2 by Nortbankboy |
A match winner of used right |
Averaging a goal or assist just over every two games in a team as leaden going forward as ours. Probably would have shown more if not stuck playing Cooperball. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 11:54 - May 2 with 2767 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Not for me, we are going to need players with a bit of dog in them and that is not Hooly.
His early goals drained away, as did the quality of his dead balls.
This is going to be scrapping for a place in the prem and I don't think he is up to it.
Coming on as a sub may work to improve on a lead, but usually if we are defending a lead we are under the cosh and he will not contribute enough in defense. | | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 13:28 - May 2 with 2722 views | lifelong |
A player with some excellent qualities but often went missing in games, somewhat disappointing, would love to be proved wrong in the play offs. |  | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 14:03 - May 2 with 2700 views | YrAlarch |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 13:28 - May 2 by lifelong |
A player with some excellent qualities but often went missing in games, somewhat disappointing, would love to be proved wrong in the play offs. |
Yes, and can't defend when called upon e.g. that second Wycombe goal. | | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 14:32 - May 2 with 2678 views | onehunglow |
At the tart he looked great and we all were excited by him .As is often the case,fans are proven wrong.
He is wrong for us,was wrong for u and will be wrong for us in the play offs.
We dont' need a craven chap even if he might be good at freekicks. | |
| |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 19:04 - May 2 with 2598 views | KeithHaynes |
For me we can’t afford to risk his lack of work rate. Give him a run out next week then send him back. He is not for us. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Conor Hourihane ? on 08:57 - May 3 with 2492 views | felixstowe_jack |
A squad player only, improved our squad this season but we need younger better players for next season. | |
| |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 09:40 - May 3 with 2473 views | Nortbankboy |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 19:04 - May 2 by KeithHaynes |
For me we can’t afford to risk his lack of work rate. Give him a run out next week then send him back. He is not for us. |
He is one of the few match winners we have.
If we want to win a game he's a must for me | | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 09:52 - May 3 with 2463 views | Fireboy2 |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 09:40 - May 3 by Nortbankboy |
He is one of the few match winners we have.
If we want to win a game he's a must for me |
Not starting though. |  | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 10:39 - May 3 with 2450 views | jack247 |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 09:52 - May 3 by Fireboy2 |
Not starting though. |
Agree. If we need a goal with time starting to run out, he is a threat from set pieces or the edge of the box.
Not worth starting him, the midfield looks pedestrian and doesn’t link as well with the front three. It’s not worth that | | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 12:12 - May 3 with 2416 views | Nortbankboy |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 10:39 - May 3 by jack247 |
Agree. If we need a goal with time starting to run out, he is a threat from set pieces or the edge of the box.
Not worth starting him, the midfield looks pedestrian and doesn’t link as well with the front three. It’s not worth that |
We have to go back to wing backs.
With 3 at the back.
The midfield 3 picks itself,fulton,grimes,hourihane.
With ayew,Lowe up front | | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 12:14 - May 3 with 2415 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 09:40 - May 3 by Nortbankboy |
He is one of the few match winners we have.
If we want to win a game he's a must for me |
Remind us again how many games he has won for us in the last 12 games. | | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 13:04 - May 3 with 2402 views | huwrichards57 |
He was a big reason why Bournemouth murdered us last time out | | | |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 18:37 - May 3 with 2346 views | Nortbankboy |
| Conor Hourihane ? on 13:04 - May 3 by huwrichards57 |
He was a big reason why Bournemouth murdered us last time out |
If we pick Smith in a 4-3-3 formation,I can't see us winning a game
Wing back formation suit the players we have | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.