| Adam Johnson on 23:33 - Feb 16 with 2422 views | Jacandme |
| Adam Johnson on 23:29 - Feb 16 by sully49 |
That is definitely the most sensible thing you've written all night, it's clear some of the posters have finally got through to you. I'd quit while I was ahead. [Post edited 17 Feb 2016 0:23]
|
That is what my point has been all the way through.
People just decided to twist what I was saying, ask misleading questions and use language nuances to distort my answers. Probably trying to create a viewpoint to argue against, whether I held that view or not seemed largely irrelevant. |  | |  |
| Adam Johnson on 23:35 - Feb 16 with 2413 views | morningstar |
| Adam Johnson on 23:33 - Feb 16 by Darran |
Nah it's not him. |
It is 100% for sure. |  |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 23:42 - Feb 16 with 2385 views | Darran |
| Adam Johnson on 23:35 - Feb 16 by morningstar |
It is 100% for sure. |
It's not. |  |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 23:44 - Feb 16 with 2384 views | morningstar |
| Adam Johnson on 23:42 - Feb 16 by Darran |
It's not. |
Do you know who it is then Dar? | |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 23:53 - Feb 16 with 2344 views | Darran |
| Adam Johnson on 23:44 - Feb 16 by morningstar |
Do you know who it is then Dar? |
No I don't but it's not him | |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 00:03 - Feb 17 with 2323 views | morningstar |
| Adam Johnson on 23:53 - Feb 16 by Darran |
No I don't but it's not him |
Trust me, if you don't know it's not him then it is him. Read through his posts, his obsessiveness holds no bounds and is clear to see. He just cannot resist the debate whether he thinks it's right or wrong. Winning the arguement is the only thing that matters. | |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 00:09 - Feb 17 with 2304 views | Darran |
| Adam Johnson on 00:03 - Feb 17 by morningstar |
Trust me, if you don't know it's not him then it is him. Read through his posts, his obsessiveness holds no bounds and is clear to see. He just cannot resist the debate whether he thinks it's right or wrong. Winning the arguement is the only thing that matters. |
It's not. | |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 00:15 - Feb 17 with 2300 views | LeonisGod |
| Adam Johnson on 23:33 - Feb 16 by Jacandme |
That is what my point has been all the way through.
People just decided to twist what I was saying, ask misleading questions and use language nuances to distort my answers. Probably trying to create a viewpoint to argue against, whether I held that view or not seemed largely irrelevant. |
Not totally. Whilst you've been misrepresented and misquoted, you also deliberately twisted things yourself.
In response to JackNZ saying the following (which was rubbish btw, as you clearly had said nothing of the sort):
"If you think it’s acceptable for your 15 year old “child” to have sexual relations with a 26 year old man, then you deserve more than a slap."
You replied:
"Of course it is acceptable if both people and sexually mature, wish to partake and it is legal. Who are you to say who someone can and can't have relations with?
"I echo the sentiments of many, 15 year old young men and women are NOT children, they have parented children, lead armies and become top athletes at that age. Unfortunately for Adam Johnson and this young lady - having relations between them at the time was not acceptable due her being technically underage in this particular country. As a byproduct of this, the older party will now be punished by the state, which they knew, and took the risk."
I assume you will be off on a "more than slapping" rampage across most of Europe then?"
You've been deliberately contradictory, mentioning "if legal" a lot when the examples in question clearly aren't legal. And appear to be making an implicit case in support of underage sex, despite denying it.
I've no problem with people holding liberal views, but they should normally try to stay within the law, and certainly should when we're talking about paedophilia.
And Skip, ffs. I hope you're trolling for your sake. Again, big difference between legality, morals, and nature. The law trumps all in order to keep others safe. So it doesn't matter a jot if kids grow up physically, they are still protected by the law you muppet! |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Adam Johnson on 00:19 - Feb 17 with 2291 views | LeonisGod |
| Adam Johnson on 00:03 - Feb 17 by morningstar |
Trust me, if you don't know it's not him then it is him. Read through his posts, his obsessiveness holds no bounds and is clear to see. He just cannot resist the debate whether he thinks it's right or wrong. Winning the arguement is the only thing that matters. |
There have been more strawmen than at a scarecrow convention. On all sides. | | | |
| Adam Johnson on 00:22 - Feb 17 with 2282 views | ItchySphincter |
| Adam Johnson on 19:16 - Feb 16 by Jacandme |
Then we cannot further the debate then can we. It is strange how you feel the law in this country is the berometer for a correct a law, yet all others around us who set their law more to their modern society are barbaric maniacs. Just wierd. |
Weird is wanting to stick your penis in a child.
That you may consider them sexually mature is a huge problem. [Post edited 17 Feb 2016 0:49]
|  |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 00:25 - Feb 17 with 2285 views | ItchySphincter |
| Adam Johnson on 19:20 - Feb 16 by skippyjack |
They're adolescents.. can't see much of a problem really.. 50/60/70 year old men have 25/30/40 year old girlfriends and wives..
yet a 19 year old can't have relations with somebody 6 years younger, considering 13 years old is an adolescent.
Careful of what?.. being a hypocrite like you lot? |
It's not about age difference. It's about the difference between an adult and a child. | |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 00:31 - Feb 17 with 2279 views | Jacandme |
| Adam Johnson on 00:22 - Feb 17 by ItchySphincter |
Weird is wanting to stick your penis in a child.
That you may consider them sexually mature is a huge problem. [Post edited 17 Feb 2016 0:49]
|
We don't disagree. | | | |
| Adam Johnson on 00:39 - Feb 17 with 2263 views | Jacandme |
| Adam Johnson on 00:15 - Feb 17 by LeonisGod |
Not totally. Whilst you've been misrepresented and misquoted, you also deliberately twisted things yourself.
In response to JackNZ saying the following (which was rubbish btw, as you clearly had said nothing of the sort):
"If you think it’s acceptable for your 15 year old “child” to have sexual relations with a 26 year old man, then you deserve more than a slap."
You replied:
"Of course it is acceptable if both people and sexually mature, wish to partake and it is legal. Who are you to say who someone can and can't have relations with?
"I echo the sentiments of many, 15 year old young men and women are NOT children, they have parented children, lead armies and become top athletes at that age. Unfortunately for Adam Johnson and this young lady - having relations between them at the time was not acceptable due her being technically underage in this particular country. As a byproduct of this, the older party will now be punished by the state, which they knew, and took the risk."
I assume you will be off on a "more than slapping" rampage across most of Europe then?"
You've been deliberately contradictory, mentioning "if legal" a lot when the examples in question clearly aren't legal. And appear to be making an implicit case in support of underage sex, despite denying it.
I've no problem with people holding liberal views, but they should normally try to stay within the law, and certainly should when we're talking about paedophilia.
And Skip, ffs. I hope you're trolling for your sake. Again, big difference between legality, morals, and nature. The law trumps all in order to keep others safe. So it doesn't matter a jot if kids grow up physically, they are still protected by the law you muppet! |
Firstly it is a relief to see at least someone can see people have been deliberately taking what I say and distorting it for their own ends. It is disappointing some prefer to argue over such matters rather than chat like grown ups.
I also am completely against underage sex, but this is where the legalities come in that you mention in my posts. Underage is determined by each country, in this country it is 16 which is why Johnson is rightly in the dock facing jail. But if we were in France for example then you adapt to their laws and they believe 15 is old enough to make such decisions. I personally would be uncomfortable if it were made lower than that, but in Europe I don't believe we face anything lower than that so as a European I am pretty satisfied with the standard of our laws. This is all my point is.
Can I just add that I find skippys posts awful and couldnt disagree more. | | | |
| Adam Johnson on 00:44 - Feb 17 with 2257 views | perchrockjack |
No professional criminal,nor any long time lag ,nor any violence merchant should feel superior to any man in his twenties having sex with a fifteen yr old girl who s fully compos mantis.
I've read some of the most sickening hypocrisy in this thread.
So, to refresh , those amongst us who might have conned old people, stick a knife in someone's guts, slashed another's face or even entered someone s house to steal or damage and left the place unliveable ,done a good robbery all tooled up...you re no better.. | |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 00:50 - Feb 17 with 2248 views | LeonisGod |
| Adam Johnson on 00:44 - Feb 17 by perchrockjack |
No professional criminal,nor any long time lag ,nor any violence merchant should feel superior to any man in his twenties having sex with a fifteen yr old girl who s fully compos mantis.
I've read some of the most sickening hypocrisy in this thread.
So, to refresh , those amongst us who might have conned old people, stick a knife in someone's guts, slashed another's face or even entered someone s house to steal or damage and left the place unliveable ,done a good robbery all tooled up...you re no better.. |
 . We're not all wrong uns perchie. | | | |
| Adam Johnson on 00:59 - Feb 17 with 2233 views | perchrockjack |
We re all sinners and I've yet to interview you.
I stand by every word.
I've heard plenty of ....he ll have it in the showers bollocks from scum who ve ripped the innards out of people.
I've a daughter of my own and hold no truck with pedastry but I've flecked if old lags are gonna assume any moral higher ground.
Anyway, some scummer approached me today whilst I was bathing in the Pacific Ocean..I had a Wales bandana on to protect my head . Cheeky fecker then asked if I wanted a drink with him tonight .
Some are truly bad judges of character . I seemed to have upset his missus too.
Never mind. | |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 04:54 - Feb 17 with 2174 views | jackonicko |
| Adam Johnson on 00:59 - Feb 17 by perchrockjack |
We re all sinners and I've yet to interview you.
I stand by every word.
I've heard plenty of ....he ll have it in the showers bollocks from scum who ve ripped the innards out of people.
I've a daughter of my own and hold no truck with pedastry but I've flecked if old lags are gonna assume any moral higher ground.
Anyway, some scummer approached me today whilst I was bathing in the Pacific Ocean..I had a Wales bandana on to protect my head . Cheeky fecker then asked if I wanted a drink with him tonight .
Some are truly bad judges of character . I seemed to have upset his missus too.
Never mind. |
I can't believe we have got to 31 pages and no one has referenced the 'divide by 2, add 7' rule.
Can't go wrong following that. |  | | |
| Adam Johnson on 08:18 - Feb 17 with 2119 views | WarwickHunt |
| Adam Johnson on 04:54 - Feb 17 by jackonicko |
I can't believe we have got to 31 pages and no one has referenced the 'divide by 2, add 7' rule.
Can't go wrong following that. |
We're talking footballers here. Gazza would have come up with anything between 23 and 37. |  | | |
| Adam Johnson on 10:14 - Feb 17 with 2047 views | waynekerr55 |
| Adam Johnson on 00:59 - Feb 17 by perchrockjack |
We re all sinners and I've yet to interview you.
I stand by every word.
I've heard plenty of ....he ll have it in the showers bollocks from scum who ve ripped the innards out of people.
I've a daughter of my own and hold no truck with pedastry but I've flecked if old lags are gonna assume any moral higher ground.
Anyway, some scummer approached me today whilst I was bathing in the Pacific Ocean..I had a Wales bandana on to protect my head . Cheeky fecker then asked if I wanted a drink with him tonight .
Some are truly bad judges of character . I seemed to have upset his missus too.
Never mind. |
What have you said now? Did you speak to her in LATIN? |  |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 11:16 - Feb 17 with 2009 views | Highjack |
| Adam Johnson on 04:54 - Feb 17 by jackonicko |
I can't believe we have got to 31 pages and no one has referenced the 'divide by 2, add 7' rule.
Can't go wrong following that. |
No but sadly there seems to be lots of people willing to apply the 'if there's grass on the wicket' rule instead. |  |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 11:33 - Feb 17 with 1989 views | Jackanapes |
| Adam Johnson on 00:44 - Feb 17 by perchrockjack |
No professional criminal,nor any long time lag ,nor any violence merchant should feel superior to any man in his twenties having sex with a fifteen yr old girl who s fully compos mantis.
I've read some of the most sickening hypocrisy in this thread.
So, to refresh , those amongst us who might have conned old people, stick a knife in someone's guts, slashed another's face or even entered someone s house to steal or damage and left the place unliveable ,done a good robbery all tooled up...you re no better.. |
 |  |
|
“The stupidest thing she knew was for people to act like they knew all about the things they knew absolutely nothing about.†|
| |
| Adam Johnson on 20:15 - Feb 17 with 1729 views | Highjack |
Allegations now that he offered her cash to meet up. Not looking good for mr Johnson but I'm sure there'll be people on her saying it's still all her fault. | |
| |
| Adam Johnson on 20:26 - Feb 17 with 1696 views | raynor94 |
| Adam Johnson on 20:15 - Feb 17 by Highjack |
Allegations now that he offered her cash to meet up. Not looking good for mr Johnson but I'm sure there'll be people on her saying it's still all her fault. |
It didn't take long! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
