| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 01:18 - Sep 29 with 190916 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Who will be watching? First one kicks off in 24 hours time.
The Democrats have pulled Joe back from his campaign trail recently to get him prepared, so hopefully it will be a decent exchange.
Unfortunately they don’t seem to have great confidence as they have spent the last month looking for any dirt they can dig up so Joe can use if he gets stuck.
It’s no coincidence that this vote influencing Facebook algorithm story is being shamelessly and inaccurately made into a race issue on the eve of the debates. So transparent and disingenuous, it’s a shame politics has come to this on this level where black people are being used in this way to score political points. I would be furious if I was them, but it does seem a lot of people are not falling for this one and calling it out for what it is.
People finally seem to be getting wise to this political race baiting which is refreshing to see.
It’s also telling that in the week of the debate they try and paint Trump as a tax evasion offender. I think that’s what they wanted the tax returns to show, they seem to have got annoyed when it turns out his tax returns were fine in accordance to what his companies profits were - but decided to run with it anyway. Any news is good news in their mind as it’s another thing Joe can use when in a tricky spot.
But I hope the discussions remain political and doesn’t turn into some form of gossip peddling reality TV episode.
Although I think there should be some kind of drinking game involved if it does turn that way, how many times Biden completely loses his thread of thought and blurts out “I mean, think about it...” you have to take a shot. 
I will be watching with great interest anyway.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 05:36 - Dec 17 with 1305 views | Groo |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 18:33 - Dec 16 by A_Fans_Dad |
Why are you repeating the lies that have already been debunked.
The simplest of all is the one "After interviewing witnesses and viewing the security footage from the arena, Watson “discovered that observers and media were not asked to leave. They simply left on their own when they saw one group of workers, whose job was only to open envelopes and who had completed that task, also leave.”
"
And "Boxes that were packed with ballots that had already been opened but not counted were resealed and placed under the table for the next session of counting, Watson said in the affidavit. "
The very sealed boxes that were taken out and processed, by the other people that were opening envelopes earlier in the day.
They have the person running that count Ralph Jones on Video of a zoom call tell Senators that they would stop counting at 10pm.
Ralph Jones is also the man that lied telling the people that they had to sop counting because there was a non existent water mains leak.
So, technically what they say is true, he didn't tell them to leave, there was no point in them staying as counting was finished until the next morning.
The video clearly shows sealed suitcase boxes brought out from under tables and taken to the processing machines.
The video clearly shows them processing the ballots through the machines. There is also video made on her phone, of Ruby Freeman, which she posted on line that showed her as she said she was"getting to work" with the ballots.
She works in the middle of the room during the day opening ballot envelopes, but after everyone has gone she moves over to where the counting machines are.
Frances Watson was clearly lying and also contradicted himself.
Have you actually watched the video yourself? |
Agree with you, lies that have been debunked.
A video over dubbed by someone on Trumps team giving false commentry.
Thrown out at court, because someone who actually knew what the video showed told it as it was.
That person was the senior Republican in overall charge of the election, who knew what he was seeing when shown the film and it was not as per the Trump team dubbing.
Lies debunked by a senior Republican. |  |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 08:54 - Dec 17 with 1255 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 05:36 - Dec 17 by Groo |
Agree with you, lies that have been debunked.
A video over dubbed by someone on Trumps team giving false commentry.
Thrown out at court, because someone who actually knew what the video showed told it as it was.
That person was the senior Republican in overall charge of the election, who knew what he was seeing when shown the film and it was not as per the Trump team dubbing.
Lies debunked by a senior Republican. |
Come on now.
Anyone who says everything was fine in that polling station is either kidding themselves or being an idiot. Don’t be the latter.
Hiding from the camera, passing things between them, discreetly dropping things into pockets. Let’s not be silly, it was horrific.
I’m fully willing to accept people saying it may not be enough to swing the result. But why pretend it was all fine and a figment of Republican imagination? Bonkers. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 11:50 - Dec 17 with 1222 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Wrong again, not the same law suits and not the same affidavits.
You love digging your holes deeper when you are wrong and can't admit it.
"My side" is not my side it is the President's side and the so called spanking in court has nothing to do with Evidence as the Judges have not allowed it to be presented. |  | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 12:02 - Dec 17 with 1220 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 14:46 - Dec 16 by Groo |
Trump claim: Trump has spread claims that voting software is “used in states where tens of thousands of votes were stolen from us and given to Biden.” He said in repeated tweets that Dominion Voting Systems is “horrible, inaccurate and anything but secure,” all of which were flagged by Twitter as disputed. He retweeted a baseless report that the voting-machine system had “deleted 2.7 million Trump votes nationwide.”
Reality: There is no evidence that any voting systems were compromised, according to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security. “The systems and processes used by election officials to tabulate votes and certify official results are protected by various safeguards that help ensure the accuracy of election results,” the agency notes on its “Rumor Control” page that refutes disinformation and misinformation about the accuracy of the election results. “These safeguards include measures that help ensure tabulation systems function as intended, protect against malicious software, and enable the identification and correction of any irregularities.”
The president fired the agency’s director on Nov. 17 with a tweet that carried a now-commonplace disclaimer from Twitter: “This claim about election fraud is disputed.” Christopher Krebs led successful efforts to help state and local election offices protect their systems and oversaw efforts to safeguard against foreign and domestic disinformation campaigns. He had countered the president’s unfounded claims of ballot fraud. |
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, you mean the agency that takes it's advice from 2 Dominion Employees?
That agency?
Did you see the fired Krebs at the Senate enquiry yesterday who said that "the 2020 elections were the safest elections ever" admitted that Counting machines were connected to the internet after the Dominion CEO the day before said it can't happen.
How can an election be safe when the system is connected to the internet. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 12:07 - Dec 17 with 1219 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 14:52 - Dec 16 by Groo |
Claim: Trump tweeted on Nov. 13 that he won Pennsylvania because “700,000 ballots were not allowed to be viewed in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.” He and Giuliani, his personal attorney, have continued to make the claim. In a court filing, the Trump campaign contended that “Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties alone received and processed 682,479 mail-in and absentee ballots without review by the political parties and candidates.”
On Dec. 2, in a 46-minute video from the White House, Trump repeated his claim and added: “There is only one possible reason that the corrupt Democrat political machine would oppose transparency during the vote counting. It’s because they know they are hiding illegal activity. It’s very simple. This is an egregious, inexcusable and irreversible harm that stains the entire election. Yet this unprecedented practice of excluding our observers, our vote watchers, as some people call them, occurred in Democrat-run cities, in key states all across the nation.”
Fact: Under Pennsylvania election law, each political party and candidate is entitled to have a representative “in the room” to watch ballots being counted, and state and local officials have said that all parties had access to the count. Allegheny County spokeswoman Amie Downs has said that “at no time were canvassing operations conducted without observers having the opportunity to see the process and the counting.” Braced for conspiracy theories, Philadelphia authorities live-streamed the count online. Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) said on Nov. 4 that “all parties have canvass observers” during the count, which continued for several days. Some 2.4 million people in Pennsylvania voted by mail in the 2020 election, and their ballots could not be opened and counted until Election Day, according to a law enacted by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature.
In its ongoing federal suit against the state and county boards of election, the campaign dropped its claim for legal action based on the assertion that observers were denied access to the count. In a revised suit filed on Nov. 15, the campaign again asked U.S. District Judge Matthew W. Brann to block the certification of Pennsylvania’s election results. But a secondary request to block the certification of all votes where observer access was allegedly restricted was deleted in the amended suit. And the new version stripped out all of the legal counts based on the allegation that ballots were counted in secret.
Trump’s pared-down lawsuit then focused on allegations that Republicans were illegally disadvantaged because some Democratic-leaning counties allowed voters to fix errors on their mail ballots. Counties have said this affected only a small number of votes.
In a ruling on Nov. 21, Brann dismissed the suit, writing that the Trump campaign had used “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations” stitched together “like Frankenstein’s Monster” in a bid to throw out millions of votes. A federal appeals court upheld that ruling on Nov. 27, writing: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here. Voters, not lawyers, choose the President. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections.”
Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar (D) certified Biden’s victory on Nov. 24, after receiving official confirmation of the presidential vote totals from all 67 counties in the state. Wolf then signed a certificate selecting Biden’s slate of electors, which was submitted to the federal government. |
Yes they allowed monitors in the room, 30 ft away from where the envelopes were opened and the ballots counted.
What "monitoring" do you think can be done from 30 ft away.
It is can clearly be seen where the Monitors and press were in the video.
Even today in the Georgia re-run the Monitors are behind barriers no where near the ballot processing.
Your idea of monitoring and mine are tow completely different things. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 12:14 - Dec 17 with 1217 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 14:43 - Dec 16 by Groo |
How about showing us where the court has not looked at specific evidence.
The Smoking gun video you claimed showed proof had been seen at court and rejected as what the Trump team commentry indicated was not correct to what was actually happened.
Here's a couple of rejections and who did the rejection.
1. Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.
Judge Stephanos Bibas, nominated to the court by Donald Trump in June 2017. He was joined in that opinion by two George W. Bush nominees, Brooks Smith and Michael Chagares.
2. We agree with the district court that Wood lacks standing to sue because he fails to allege a particularized injury. And because Georgia has already certified its election results and its slate of presidential electors, Wood’s requests for emergency relief are moot to the extent they concern the 2020 election. The Constitution makes clear that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction . . . we may not entertain post-election contests about garden-variety issues of vote counting and misconduct that may properly be filed in state courts.
George W. Bush appointee William Pryor, a judge who’s on Donald Trump’s short list for potential Supreme Court nominees. He was joined by Barbara Lagoa, a Trump appointee who was also on Trump’s SCOTUS list.
Then there's also the fact that they make big claims in front of the camera and then change it in front of the court.
In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.
In a separate state case in Montgomery County, Pa., a judge asked Trump lawyer Jonathan S. Goldstein whether he was alleging fraud. “Your honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” Goldstein said. “And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the [Democratic National Committee] or anybody else involved in this a liar. Everybody is coming to this with good faith.” The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”
In yet another state case in Bucks County, Pa., Trump’s attorneys signed a joint stipulation of facts that explicitly admits that they are not alleging fraud, despite the President and his lawyers’ repeated public claims, according to Marc Elias, a lawyer working for Democrats on election-related cases. The stipulation of facts reads in part: “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots.” The stipulation also says they don’t allege or have evidence of “misconduct” or “impropriety” in connection with the challenged ballots.
On Thursday, a judge rejected the Trump campaign’s attempt to throw out absentee ballots in the Bucks County case, noting, “The parties specifically stipulated in their comprehensive stipulation of facts that there exists no evidence of any fraud, misconduct, or any impropriety with respect to the challenged ballots. There is nothing in the record and nothing alleged that would lead to the conclusion that any of the challenged ballots were submitted by someone not qualified or entitled to vote in this election.”
So basically its all bluff. |
What court saw the videos and rejected them?
The guy that rejecte dthe video clearly lied, if you can't see that from his statement your reading ability is lacking.
Read how he contradicts himself. Quote "Boxes that were packed with ballots that had already been opened but not counted were resealed and placed under the table for the next session of counting, Watson said in the affidavit. "
The people who stayed behind and illegally scanned ballots were only supposed to be opening envelopes.
The very same envelopes he said were already opened and the Ballots placed under the table for the next day.
In his zoom conference the leader of that group told the senators that he would be finishing about 10pm and he would be finished counting the remaining 20,000 outstanding ballots the following day.
What were they counting over the following week?
Zeese you are so gullible. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 13:38 - Dec 17 with 1206 views | Kilkennyjack |
Trump is a loser. |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 13:47 - Dec 17 with 1203 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 05:36 - Dec 17 by Groo |
Agree with you, lies that have been debunked.
A video over dubbed by someone on Trumps team giving false commentry.
Thrown out at court, because someone who actually knew what the video showed told it as it was.
That person was the senior Republican in overall charge of the election, who knew what he was seeing when shown the film and it was not as per the Trump team dubbing.
Lies debunked by a senior Republican. |
Where was it thrown out of court?
The description given is as I have explained bull.
The guy contradicts himself by claiming the boxes under the table are ballots from opened envelopes to be processed the next day and yet they were processed for 2 hours while their was no oversight as can be clearly seen in thevideo.
How can you watch the video and come to any other conclusion.
Similarly how can you watch the beginning of the video and say that the oversight could see anything for the whole day that was happening on the tables 30 ft away.
The same was happenning in Georgia yesterday, oversight behind a steel barrier where they can't see anything. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 13:54 - Dec 17 with 1200 views | A_Fans_Dad |
This is an interesting development, a judge who actually wants see the evidence from Dr. Ayyurdai MIT PhD who had to represent himself because no lawyer would take his case.
| | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 14:00 - Dec 17 with 1194 views | A_Fans_Dad |
I wonder why Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson refused to testify before legislative oversight committees Tuesday investigating allegations of fraud during the 2020 general election.
What could she possibly have to hide? | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:07 - Dec 17 with 1172 views | londonlisa2001 |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 13:54 - Dec 17 by A_Fans_Dad |
This is an interesting development, a judge who actually wants see the evidence from Dr. Ayyurdai MIT PhD who had to represent himself because no lawyer would take his case.
|
Ah yes, the man who ‘invented email’ snigger.
If you’d bothered to actually read what happened rather than the genuinely ridiculous tweet from Mr Email, the court told him he’d brought action against the wrong people, and instead of just throwing it out with prejudice (the judge’s comments are both hilarious and withering), he suggested that he could bring the case against the correct defendant ((when it will be thrown out for the same reasons) so dismissed without prejudice.
Bearing in mind the nature of the cases that have found legal representation, an you imagine how ludicrous one has to be to have lawyers running away...
Do you think it’s possible that you are the one who’s unable to accept the truth? I mean even Trump has (beyond the gritting, he’s actually planning to move to Mar-a-Lago where the residents are taking legal action against him to stop him moving in). | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:13 - Dec 17 with 1170 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:07 - Dec 17 by londonlisa2001 |
Ah yes, the man who ‘invented email’ snigger.
If you’d bothered to actually read what happened rather than the genuinely ridiculous tweet from Mr Email, the court told him he’d brought action against the wrong people, and instead of just throwing it out with prejudice (the judge’s comments are both hilarious and withering), he suggested that he could bring the case against the correct defendant ((when it will be thrown out for the same reasons) so dismissed without prejudice.
Bearing in mind the nature of the cases that have found legal representation, an you imagine how ludicrous one has to be to have lawyers running away...
Do you think it’s possible that you are the one who’s unable to accept the truth? I mean even Trump has (beyond the gritting, he’s actually planning to move to Mar-a-Lago where the residents are taking legal action against him to stop him moving in). |
According to the mass media, which you always believe. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:22 - Dec 17 with 1165 views | londonlisa2001 |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:13 - Dec 17 by A_Fans_Dad |
According to the mass media, which you always believe. |
Well there are two arguments one could choose to believe:
1. There are thousands and thousands of people all over the US who have been involved in some giant conspiracy to prevent Trump from winning an election. These include courts and judges at every level, including justices that Trump has appointed, all the way up to and including the Supreme Court. Huge tech companies are involved, all media including Fox, governors and electoral bodies of both Democratic and Republican persuasion. The fraud is widespread, but only in States that Trump lost, Dominion machines switched hundreds of thousands of votes, but only in States that Trump lost, and the fraud was so cute that it didn’t switch the votes of even a couple of senate races, necessary to ensure that the new President was able to implement his programme.
2. Trump is a liar.
Decisions, decisions. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:36 - Dec 17 with 1160 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:22 - Dec 17 by londonlisa2001 |
Well there are two arguments one could choose to believe:
1. There are thousands and thousands of people all over the US who have been involved in some giant conspiracy to prevent Trump from winning an election. These include courts and judges at every level, including justices that Trump has appointed, all the way up to and including the Supreme Court. Huge tech companies are involved, all media including Fox, governors and electoral bodies of both Democratic and Republican persuasion. The fraud is widespread, but only in States that Trump lost, Dominion machines switched hundreds of thousands of votes, but only in States that Trump lost, and the fraud was so cute that it didn’t switch the votes of even a couple of senate races, necessary to ensure that the new President was able to implement his programme.
2. Trump is a liar.
Decisions, decisions. |
Perhaps instead of using the mass media to make your decisions you should use the various hearings that have been happening over the last week or so.
As to Dr Shiva's case I would like to see your link to the latest judgement.
Can you provide it please?
The huge tech companies have been involved, including making illegal donations which interfered with election.
As you must know from your reading habits. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:50 - Dec 17 with 1152 views | Humpty |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:22 - Dec 17 by londonlisa2001 |
Well there are two arguments one could choose to believe:
1. There are thousands and thousands of people all over the US who have been involved in some giant conspiracy to prevent Trump from winning an election. These include courts and judges at every level, including justices that Trump has appointed, all the way up to and including the Supreme Court. Huge tech companies are involved, all media including Fox, governors and electoral bodies of both Democratic and Republican persuasion. The fraud is widespread, but only in States that Trump lost, Dominion machines switched hundreds of thousands of votes, but only in States that Trump lost, and the fraud was so cute that it didn’t switch the votes of even a couple of senate races, necessary to ensure that the new President was able to implement his programme.
2. Trump is a liar.
Decisions, decisions. |
Wow. That's a toughie.
I think I'd go with answer 2. |  | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:55 - Dec 17 with 1152 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 15:22 - Dec 17 by londonlisa2001 |
Well there are two arguments one could choose to believe:
1. There are thousands and thousands of people all over the US who have been involved in some giant conspiracy to prevent Trump from winning an election. These include courts and judges at every level, including justices that Trump has appointed, all the way up to and including the Supreme Court. Huge tech companies are involved, all media including Fox, governors and electoral bodies of both Democratic and Republican persuasion. The fraud is widespread, but only in States that Trump lost, Dominion machines switched hundreds of thousands of votes, but only in States that Trump lost, and the fraud was so cute that it didn’t switch the votes of even a couple of senate races, necessary to ensure that the new President was able to implement his programme.
2. Trump is a liar.
Decisions, decisions. |
Let's see how your batting average and mass media is doing regarding Trump shall we?
He wouldn't win - wrong
The Steele dossier being true - wrong
Mueller investigation would put him in jail - wrong
Mueller's Russia Russia was true - wrong the cases collapsed
Stone would bring him down - wrong
I am sure that you thought he would lose the false indictment - wrong
Hunter Biden laptop info was not real - wrong
Biden's Ukraine involvement - wrong
You need to change your sources, they aren't doing very well and neither are you. [Post edited 17 Dec 2020 15:57]
| | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 16:13 - Dec 17 with 1147 views | Fireboy2 |
I come on to have a little peruse and AFD is STILL banging the drum.
He will soon be like the theorists who still claim the world is flat. |  | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 16:35 - Dec 17 with 1142 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 16:13 - Dec 17 by Fireboy2 |
I come on to have a little peruse and AFD is STILL banging the drum.
He will soon be like the theorists who still claim the world is flat. |
And you have nothing to offer except drive by comments.
Totally data & information devoid comments. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 17:26 - Dec 17 with 1125 views | johnlangy |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 13:38 - Dec 17 by Kilkennyjack |
Trump is a loser. |
Succinctly put kk. He lost, Biden won.
And the world's a better place for it. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 17:55 - Dec 17 with 1116 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 17:26 - Dec 17 by johnlangy |
Succinctly put kk. He lost, Biden won.
And the world's a better place for it. |
I am actually staggered that you think that having a senile or an alzheimer's suffering Biden as President of the USA is in any way a good thing for the world.
But I expect that you know he will be replaced immediately, so you think Harris would be good.
Or is it that you just hate President Trump so anybody will do? | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 18:09 - Dec 17 with 1107 views | Humpty |
Oh well. If that nice Mr Bannon says so then that's me convinced. I change my vote to option 1 now. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 18:52 - Dec 17 with 1085 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 18:09 - Dec 17 by Humpty |
Oh well. If that nice Mr Bannon says so then that's me convinced. I change my vote to option 1 now. |
As usual you get it completely wrong the upload is from Peter Navarro if you had actually bothered to click the link.
But that is your problem all the way through.
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:27 - Dec 17 with 1068 views | Humpty |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 18:52 - Dec 17 by A_Fans_Dad |
As usual you get it completely wrong the upload is from Peter Navarro if you had actually bothered to click the link.
But that is your problem all the way through.
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. |
And if Mr Bannon has published it on his website, or war room (snigger) as he calls it, then I assume he agrees with it. So that's me in. | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:01 - Dec 17 with 1055 views | Humpty |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:27 - Dec 17 by Humpty |
And if Mr Bannon has published it on his website, or war room (snigger) as he calls it, then I assume he agrees with it. So that's me in. |
And this is what happens when idiots believe the kind of bullshit that AFD puts out. Innocent people suffer.
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/12/15/steven-hotze-texas-election-fraud-Housto
Thankfully nobody was hurt this time but when people with lots of guns but very little brains get deliberately wound up by cynical actors someone will really get hurt. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.