| What did the Ref Actually say?? 21:05 - Oct 30 with 5589 views | kingsburyR |
I haven't a clue |  |
| Dont know why we bother. .... but we do! |
| |  |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 13:54 - Nov 1 with 512 views | R_from_afar |
I think the expression we are looking for is "trumped up".
I wonder if Chelsea's attitude is connected to their owner. RA is clearly a man who is used to getting his own way, whatever it takes.
RFA
|  |
| "Things had started becoming increasingly desperate at Loftus Road but QPR have been handed a massive lifeline and the place has absolutely erupted. it's carnage. It's bedlam. It's 1-1." |
| |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:02 - Nov 1 with 508 views | Juzzie |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 12:50 - Nov 1 by Konk |
Hopefully Clattenburg will do the decent thing and retire from the game before going into hiding with Anders Frisk somewhere in the Swedish countryside. As Robbie-Bobby-Bob Di Matteo says, they don't expect everything to go in their favour, but the big decisions certainly should. They're happy to let the odd throw on the halfway line go if a proper risk assessment has been carried out and there's no danger of Chelsea dropping points at that stage in the game, so they're not being unreasonable.
Everytime you think Chelsea have reached the absolute zenith of cun tiness, have exhausted the well of wa nk and made you hate modern football as much as you can, they somehow manage to conjure up one more incident to make you hate them just that little bit more.
What a horrible cun t of a club they are.
PS. Interesting that Mikel can go all omerta when a team mate screams racist abuse at a black opponent, but goes Jonny fuc king Rambo when he gets a fifth hand account of what someone is meant to have said to him.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|
For me, no & yes.
no: If Clattenburg was to retire from the game it's effectively villifying Chelsea's stance that he said something bad.
yes: Chelsea is a kunt of a club. CFC = Cnt Football Club. |  | | |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:21 - Nov 1 with 498 views | Konk |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:02 - Nov 1 by Juzzie |
For me, no & yes.
no: If Clattenburg was to retire from the game it's effectively villifying Chelsea's stance that he said something bad.
yes: Chelsea is a kunt of a club. CFC = Cnt Football Club. |
Clattenburg has no option but to retire from the game and go into permanent exile. If he’s got any sense of decency, he’ll shack up with Anders Frisk in a forest somewhere in Northern Sweden, whilst he learns how to forage for berries and elk chod. You can’t give major decisions against Chelsea and expect to get away with it — those days are long gone. He's out of his depth and now he needs to disappear. It's like the Bourne Identity but with more hair product and less guns and shi t. The authorities need to make an example of him. |  |
| Fulham FC: It's the taking part that counts |
| |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:31 - Nov 1 with 475 views | Juzzie |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:21 - Nov 1 by Konk |
Clattenburg has no option but to retire from the game and go into permanent exile. If he’s got any sense of decency, he’ll shack up with Anders Frisk in a forest somewhere in Northern Sweden, whilst he learns how to forage for berries and elk chod. You can’t give major decisions against Chelsea and expect to get away with it — those days are long gone. He's out of his depth and now he needs to disappear. It's like the Bourne Identity but with more hair product and less guns and shi t. The authorities need to make an example of him. |
Actually, you're right. Decisions not going in Chelsea's favour is a heinous crime.
| | | |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:35 - Nov 1 with 467 views | Jamie |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:21 - Nov 1 by Konk |
Clattenburg has no option but to retire from the game and go into permanent exile. If he’s got any sense of decency, he’ll shack up with Anders Frisk in a forest somewhere in Northern Sweden, whilst he learns how to forage for berries and elk chod. You can’t give major decisions against Chelsea and expect to get away with it — those days are long gone. He's out of his depth and now he needs to disappear. It's like the Bourne Identity but with more hair product and less guns and shi t. The authorities need to make an example of him. |
Do they have a branch of Advanced Hair Studio in Northern Sweden? |  | | |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:38 - Nov 1 with 463 views | Konk |
| What did the Ref Actually say?? on 14:35 - Nov 1 by Jamie |
Do they have a branch of Advanced Hair Studio in Northern Sweden? |
I suspect that's what will prove his undoing in the end. He'll be lured back to his hair therapist and be picked-up in a sting organised by the FSB and CFC. | |
| Fulham FC: It's the taking part that counts |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.